Doctrines
Blood and transfusions: what really changed?
The March 20, 2026 update in the light of Scripture and of the very same publications
Reading time: ~10 minutes
“Make sure of all things; hold fast to what is fine.”
Why this article
1.“If anyone knows how to do what is right and yet does not do it, it is a sin for him” (James 4:17, NWT). If we know something that can protect the lives of our brothers and sisters, staying silent would be the real mistake.
2.The March 20, 2026 update on autologous blood has caused a lot of confusion. “So is it allowed now?” “What about those who refused before?” “What do I do with my advance directive card?” Many haven’t understood what really changed — or what it means for their life and that of their family.
3.We’re not here to attack the Governing Body — they are men doing their best. We are brothers who did what the Scriptures ask of us: verifying. “Make sure of all things” is not rebellion — it is a biblical principle. The Beroeans of Acts 17:11 were called “more noble-minded” precisely because they verified everything, even the words of an apostle.
4. Every quotation that follows is taken from official Watchtower publications or from jw.org. You won’t find our opinions — you’ll find their own words, placed side by side. Read to the end. Then verify for yourselves.
What the Governing Body said on March 20, 2026
5. On March 20, 2026, Gerrit Losch published Governing Body Update #2 of 2026 in a video on jw.org. His exact words:
“Each Christian must decide for himself how his own blood will be used in any medical or surgical care. This includes whether to allow his own blood to be drawn, stored, and then reinfused.”
“The Bible does not comment on the use of one’s own blood in medical and surgical care.”
Let’s read it again: the Bible does not comment.
6. In practice, autologous predeposit— that is, the withdrawal, storage, and subsequent reinfusion of one’s own blood prior to a procedure — goes from forbidden to a matter of personal conscience.
7.Here is a summary of what changed and what didn’t:
| Before March 20, 2026 | After March 20, 2026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Donor blood | Forbidden | Forbidden (unchanged) |
| Blood fractions | Personal conscience | Personal conscience (unchanged) |
| Autologous predeposit (one’s own stored blood) | Forbidden | Personal conscience |
8.The only change concerns autologous predeposit. Everything else remains unchanged. Losch explained that the decision came after “much prayer and consideration.”
9.So far, so clear. But there’s a detail that many brothers haven’t noticed — one that deserves our full attention.
The “clarification” up close
10. In the update, Losch cited a previous Watchtowerarticle as if it confirmed the new position — as if it had always been that way. But what did that very same article actually say?
11. The Watchtowerof October 15, 2000, “Questions From Readers” (wol.jw.org), addressed autologous predeposit. The exact words:
“Sometimes doctors urge patients to deposit their own blood weeks before surgery (preoperative autologous blood donation, or PAD) so that if the need arises, this stored blood could be transfused. Such collecting, storing, and reinfusing of blood, however, directly contradicts what is said in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Blood is not to be stored; it is to be poured out — returned to God, as it were.”
12. And a few lines later:
“Granted, the Mosaic Law is not in force today. Yet, Jehovah’s Witnesses respect the principles God included in it, and they are determined to ‘abstain from blood.’ Thus, we do not donate blood, nor do we store for transfusion our blood that should be ‘poured out.’ That practice conflicts with God’s law.”
13.Let’s place the two positions side by side:
Before — Watchtower October 15, 2000
“Such collecting, storing, and reinfusing [...] directly contradictswhat is said in Leviticus and Deuteronomy.”
“That practice conflicts with God’s law.”
Autologous predeposit = FORBIDDEN. Disassociation.
After — GB March 20, 2026
“The Bible does not commenton the use of one’s own blood in medical care.”
“Each Christian must decide for himself.”
Autologous predeposit = PERSONAL CONSCIENCE.
“Why on earth would Jehovah reveal to the faithful slave one thing as true today, and as false 26 years later, costing the lives of thousands of his faithful servants?”
A reflection.If the Bible does not speak about the use of one’s own blood in a medical context — as the Governing Body now admits — where does it speak about someone else’s blood? If blood is sacred and must be “poured out on the ground,” the principle should not distinguish based on the source.
Each one is invited to do their own research on this. “Each one will carry his own load” (Galatians 6:5, NWT). Life is sacred to Jehovah — and on this there are no interpretations.
14. We’re not interpreting. We’re reading.The very same words printed by the very same organization. One said “directly contradicts God’s law.” The other says “the Bible does not comment.” It is not possible for both to be true.
15.Before March 20, 2026, a brother or sister who had stored their own blood for reinfusion would have been considered as one who had chosen to disassociate themselves — with all the consequences: the public announcement, the loss of contact with brothers, the loss of one’s loved ones. There was no margin for personal conscience. There was a ban written in black and white, defined as “God’s law.”
16. If you’re feeling uncomfortable, that’s normal.We felt it too. We reopened the publications, hoping to find something that would disprove what we were reading. We didn’t find it. We’re not saying the Governing Body deliberately erred. They are sincere men. But men. And the printed words speak for themselves.
What this means for you, concretely
17. There is an urgent practical matter that concerns our safety and that of our families.
18. If you have an advance healthcare directive (DAT in Italy) on file at the municipality: it likely includes the refusal of autologous predeposit. That document, perhaps signed years ago, no longer reflects the official position — nor perhaps your current conscience. If you were to have an accident and be unconscious, doctors would act based on that paper. The advance directive speaks for you when you cannot speak. Italian Law 219/2017 guarantees you the right to update it at any time. At bombablu.org/en/vita/revoca-dat you’ll find a practical guide.
19. If you have a “No Blood” card:cards issued before March 20, 2026 contain the refusal of autologous predeposit — a clause that is now obsolete. If your doctor has that card on file, they could deny you an option that you are now free to accept. Talk to your doctor.
20. If you have a scheduled procedure: ask your surgeon if autologous predeposit is available. If you are a parent:verify that your children’s medical documents reflect your current choices, not those of five years ago. Are your children protected?
21.You don’t need to make decisions right now. But you need to know.This is not medical advice — we’re not doctors. It’s an invitation to make sure your documents say what you want them to say.
The question that arises
22.If the Bible “does not comment” on the use of one’s own blood in medical care — the Governing Body’s exact words on March 20, 2026 — why were we taught the opposite for 26 years? Why does a practice that The Watchtowerof 2000 called “in conflict with God’s law” become a matter of conscience? The Bible has not received any new verses. The only thing that has changed is the interpretation of the men who guide us.
23.Think of a wedding ring. Blood represents life, just as the ring represents marriage. But if a man were drowning with his wedding ring on his finger, and someone said to him “take off the ring or I won’t save you” — would we be protecting the marriage, or would we be sacrificing a life for a symbol? The symbol exists to honor what it represents. Not the other way around.
24. Some of us know brothers and sisters who have lost their lives by refusing a procedure that is now considered a matter of conscience. To them and to their families go our deepest condolences. There are no words adequate for the pain of those who remain.
25.James 3:1 reminds us: “Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, knowing that we will receive heavier judgment” (NWT). Whoever teaches has an enormous responsibility. We don’t have all the answers. But we believe that the right questions are a duty — not a sin.
Most frequent objections
26.We know that reading these lines raises questions and objections. It’s natural. We had them too. Let’s look at the most common ones.
27.“It’s progressive light — Proverbs 4:18.”
Proverbs 4:18 compares the path of the righteous to a light that keeps shining brighter. But there’s a difference between light that becomes clearer and light that changes direction. “Directly contradicts God’s law” does not become “the Bible does not comment” through progressive light. It’s not a sharper detail: it’s a position reversed by 180 degrees. A brighter path does not make a U-turn.
28.“The Governing Body does its best — they’re not perfect.”
True. We’re not judging intentions. But James 3:1 reminds us that those who teach “will receive heavier judgment.” When you teach something with consequences for life and death, “doing your best” does not eliminate those consequences. They themselves admit they are neither inspired nor infallible. Let’s take them at their word — and treat their teachings with the critical spirit the Bible asks of us.
29.“This is not the time to criticize — this is a step forward.”
We’re verifying — as 1 Thessalonians 5:21 teaches. If verifying is criticizing, the Beroeans of Acts 17:11 were critics — yet the Bible calls them “more noble-minded.” We are quoting their own publications. If reading what they have written is criticism, the problem is not with the reader.
30.“Those who died did so out of faith — Jehovah will reward them.”
We respect this sentiment. But faith in whom?In God? Or in the interpretation of men who now say “the Bible does not comment”? If it didn’t comment in 2026, it didn’t comment in 2000, in 2010, or in 2020 either. Those who refused that procedure did so for a human teaching, not for a divine command. This changes the meaning of that choice.
Points for reflection
31.Three questions. We’re not asking for immediate answers. Just that you think about them — in the silence of your conscience, in the moments when you are alone with Jehovah.
Three questions for the conscience
32. First question.If a teaching presented as “God’s law” can change to “the Bible does not comment,” what does this tell us about the source of that teaching? Did it come from God — or did it come from men?
33. Second question.If the Governing Body is neither inspired nor infallible — as they themselves admit — is it wise to entrust our own life, or that of our children, to an interpretation that could change tomorrow?
34. Third question.What other teachings that are presented to us today as “biblical truths” might change tomorrow? And if they were to change, what would it mean for the decisions we have made based on them?
One thing is certain
35. This update is not the first. And, if history teaches us anything, it will not be the last.
36.Let’s look at the facts:
Vaccinations
“Violation of the covenant with Noah”
Forbidden 1921 → Allowed 1952
31 years
Organ transplants
“Cannibalism”
Forbidden 1967 → Allowed 1980
13 years
Autologous predeposit
“In conflict with God’s law”
Forbidden 2000 → Allowed 2026
26 years
In each case, the Bible had not changed. Only the interpretations had changed.
And every time, between the ban and its reversal, real consequences in the lives of real people.
37.There’s a concept we all know well: the “new light.” In the next reflection we’ll examine it in the light of Scripture. What is it really? Where does it come from? How does it work? And above all: how many times has it changed direction — and at what cost?
38.If what we’ve read today has made us think, the next article will give us the tools to understand the why. Not the why of a single change — but the why of an entire pattern.
“Make sure of all things; hold fast to what is fine.”
“You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
39.Verify for yourselves. Open the publications cited. Read the paragraphs with your own eyes. Don’t trust us — trust the Scriptures and your own conscience. The truth is not afraid of questions.
The God of the Bible: a Father who saves
40. Who is the God we worship? It is in the Scriptures themselves that we find the clearest answer.
41.When Abraham learned that Jehovah was about to destroy Sodom, he asked: “Suppose there are 50 righteous men in the city...” And Jehovah replied that he would forgive the entire city. Abraham continued — 40, 30, 20, 10 — and every time Jehovah agreed (Genesis 18:23-32, NWT). This is Jehovah’s character: a God who looks for reasons to save, not to destroy.
42. When some in Israel sacrificed their own children in the fire believing they were gaining divine approval, Jehovah said:
“They have built the high places of Topheth [...] in order to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, something that I had not commanded and that had never even come into my heart.”
It had never even come into my heart. The idea of sacrificing human lives for his approval has never crossed the mind of the Creator.
43. And Jesus? When he healed a man on the Sabbath, the Pharisees wanted to condemn him. Jesus replied:
“The Sabbath came into existence for the sake of man, and not man for the sake of the Sabbath.”
And he asked:
“Is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do bad, to save or to kill a life?”
44. Jesus broke the Sabbath law to save a life. If the Son of God showed that life takes priority over law, is it possible that the Father would ask us to sacrifice life for a symbol?
45.To believe that Jehovah revealed 26 years ago “blood must not be stored” and today “blood can be stored,” with about 33,000 verified deaths in the meantime, is impossible. We must have the courage to accept it.
Not because we don’t believe in the Governing Body. But because we love Jehovah. The God who looks for reasons to save, who never thought of sacrificing human lives, who sent his Son to heal on the Sabbath — that God would never have asked a father to watch his own child die over a human interpretation.
Let’s look more deeply into this “new light” — the next article clarifies the matter of progressive understanding.
A Member of the Lovers of Truth
The question that arises now
If the doctrine on blood has changed like this — after seventy years of “God’s law” turned into “the Bible does not comment” — one question arises spontaneously:
What really is the “new light”?
Is it Jehovah progressively revealing the truth, as the publications teach? Or is it an organization that corrects itself after having erred, and calls “light” what yesterday it called “eternal truth”?
And what if the decisions we are making with this “new light” turn out to be wrong a few years from now?
Today, saying “The Bible says to refuse to store one’s own blood because it must be poured out on the ground” is a lie.
So have we been living in a lie for over seventy years?
Was this lie revealed by Jehovah through Christ to the Governing Body?
In the next reflection we’ll verify what the Bible really says about how God communicates with his people.
Continue the reflection →Sources
- Governing Body Update #2 (2026)— Official video on jw.org, speaker Gerrit Losch, March 20, 2026 — jw.org
- The Watchtower, October 15, 2000— “Questions From Readers” — available on wol.jw.org
- AABB (Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies) — “Jehovah’s Witnesses to Permit Autologous Blood Transfusion”, March 24, 2026 — aabb.org
- Associated Press / Religion News Service— “Jehovah’s Witnesses ease policy on transfusions, allowing storage and use of one’s own blood”, March 23, 2026 — religionnews.com
- Washington Post— “Jehovah’s Witnesses ease policy on transfusions”, March 20, 2026
- Italian Law 219/2017— Rules on informed consent and advance healthcare directives (DAT) — gazzettaufficiale.it
- RiminiToday— “Epochal turn among Jehovah’s Witnesses on blood transfusions”, March 2026
